THE CANADIAN PRESS
 

CFL.ca Staff

WINNIPEG -- Following their Week 2 loss to the Montreal Alouettes, Paul LaPolice took some heat regarding a gutsy decision late in the fourth quarter.

LaPolice defends his call


“We hadn’t stopped them very much on defence and we were missing two starting defensive backs on the next series, Dan West was playing SAM linebacker.” 
-
Paul LaPolice

Down by 11 with just over five minutes remaining and facing a crucial third down on the Montreal six-yard line, LaPolice made the executive decision to go for a touchdown, rather than kicking a field goal.

The gamble didn’t pay off for the Bombers, as quarterback Buck Pierce was flushed out of the pocket and eventually fumbled the ball while being sacked by Alouettes defensive end Mike Lockley.

Despite the result, LaPolice continues to stand by his decision.

“I know in the textbook when you’re down 11 you kick a field goal, but sometimes there are other factors that go into that,” said LaPolice on Monday.

“The first thing I would say is, when you’re on the 9, 10, 11, 12 (yard line), anywhere farther back you’re kicking a field goal. But at the six, then you can make a decision possibly if you have a play that can score.”

On Montreal’s ensuing possession, they would extend their lead to 18 thanks to an 11-yard touchdown run by Brandon Whitaker.

Winnipeg would go on to add another touchdown, but ended up losing 41-30. LaPolice went on to say that the situation he was presented with called for the decision to for it on third down.

“We hadn’t stopped them very much on defence and we were missing two starting defensive backs on the next series, Dan West was playing SAM linebacker,” said LaPolice.

“So after talks and thoughts, if I get three points and we’re down eight, they’re going to take the ball at the 35-yard line, get a couple of first downs I figured and kick a field goal and put me down 11 points again.”

“I just felt that we weren’t able to stop them, and that’s what happened, they drove 100 yards for a touchdown and it doesn’t matter what you did after that,” he concluded.

The loss put the Bombers at 0-2, tied for last place in the East Division. They travel to Edmonton to take on the Eskimos (1-1) on Friday night.

Fan Comments
bowlerdude
As someone who is very much in favour of being aggressive / gutsy and who will almost always defend the coaches in those situations ... you kick the field goal, get a stop and it's a 1-score game. Calling that play there basically meant . The Bombers needed to put another drive together after that either way. Only difference was, kicking the FG from there you're almost guaranteed you're giving yourself a chance if you can get a stop. If you go for the TD, you are only giving yourself a chance if you can come up with a key 6 yard play. Different story if they were still on the 1 because a QB sneak or something will give you that the vast majority of the time. From the 6, it's a horrible call.
July 11, 2012 - 10:50am
cflsteve
I think it may have been in the back of his mind that Pierce finally got the ball inside the ten and odds were he would not be able to do it again. So since he was that close the time to go for the TD was then and on the next possesion most likely would only be able to get the team into field goal range. So he took the TD shot while he had the chance. Does not speak well for the confidence in his QB.
When will enough be enough. Calgary finally broke down and made the change late last season in Tate for Burris and lets face it Pierce is no Burris.
July 11, 2012 - 9:10pm
cflsteve
Throughout his career Pierce always seemed to play better as a backup off the bench where is hard nosed gutsy play could spark a team but he has been unable to sustain a whole season due ti injury and last year when he did get through 16 games he led the league in 2 and outs.
July 11, 2012 - 9:27pm
 
cflsteve
right decision wrong QB. pierce continues to be too hesitant Brink shows much more confidence. How long will La Police wait. A change in QB may be the spark they need.
July 11, 2012 - 1:46am
 
GoTi-Cats
LaPolice made the right decision. I know conventional wisdom is "it's not over till it's over" but the way those two teams were playing that day it was over unless something really sparked the Bombers. A major would have done it but a FG wouldn't have in my opinion.
July 10, 2012 - 9:12pm